Constitutional Collapse and the Vanishing Social Contract in Libya and Sudan
/Sami SAEED
Dr Sami Saeed analyses how conflicts in Sudan and Libya affect the countries’ social contracts and constitutional order.
Read MoreDr Sami Saeed analyses how conflicts in Sudan and Libya affect the countries’ social contracts and constitutional order.
Read MoreOdile Ammann explores the symptoms of language bias in Comparative Constitutional Law Scholarship, which seems to lead to the prevalence of the English language in the field and weakens the quality of comparative pursuits. AI translations are hardly a satisfying solution.
Read MoreAhead of the referendum on constitutional revisions to the judiciary in Italy later in March 2026, Tania Groppi considers how the reform proposals - encompassing the separation between adjudicative and prosecutorial careers, the composition of the Superior Council of the Judiciary and the creation of the High Disciplinary court as a novel disciplinary body - weaken judicial independence and the rule of law.
Read MoreMasahiko Kinoshita examines language barriers in global constitutional dialogue. Although the linguistically driven core-periphery structure poses a significant challenge, a range of mitigating strategies is available for both journal publishing and international conferences.
Read MoreIn the latest post in our symposium on Small State Constitutionalism, Maartje De Visser and Elisabeth Perham explore the idea of ‘stateness’, arguing for greater attention in comparative constitutional scholarship to the constitutional experiences and designs of non-independent and non-sovereign jurisdictions.
Read MoreErika Arban, Maartje De Visser and Jeong-In Yun introduce a new symposium on ‘The Language of Comparative Constitutional Law – Questioning Hegemonies’. Based on an edited collection published by Hart in 2025, it critically discusses the role and impact of language in comparative constitutional law studies.
Read MoreTracy Robinson explores dyadic constitutionalism in the Anglo-Caribbean—an understudied form of constitutional pluralism in which internal constitutions operate alongside enduring imperial legal authority. The post shows how colonial constitutional infrastructure continues to shape sovereignty, judicial power, gender equality, and democratic change in small Caribbean states and overseas territories.
Read MoreIn the latest post in our symposium on Small State Constitutionalism, Elisa Bertolini discusses the experiences of Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and San Marino, highlighting how scale, identity and history shape constitutional design.
Read MoreAnna Dziedzic examines multitasked office as a constitutional design choice in small states, analyzing its motivations, benefits, and risks in Kiribati, Nauru, and the Marshall Islands.
Read MoreIn the latest addition to the IACL Blog’s new series ‘Spotlight on the Venice Commission’, Professor Francesco Biagi (Bologna) unpacks the Venice Commission’s newly unveiled and updated Rule of Law Checklist and how it helps us comprehend and push back against authoritarianism.
Read MoreIne Apapoe and Janine Ubink explore Suriname’s strong legal pluralism, where Indigenous and Maroon communities assert customary authority over land and resources, challenging the state’s claim to ultimate constitutional authority.
Read MoreSinethemba Memela examines the uses and misuses of law and custom in Eswatini as a small constitutional state. In the country, authoritarianism has been discursively legitimised through an identitarian construction of Swazis as an inherently peaceful and acquiescent people – a narrative systemically weaponized to repress political dissent and domesticate the judiciary.
Read MoreJohn Stanton examines Malta’s government and democracy from its time as a British colony to post-independence.
Read MoreIn Pacific constitutional studies, written constitutions are often framed as postcolonial products – legal instruments adopted in the wake of empire. Tonga stands apart from this narrative. As the only Pacific Island nation never formally colonised (though it was a British protectorate from 1900 to 1970), Tonga developed its own constitutional order through a process that cannot be explained adequately by modern constitutional theory or legal pluralism.
Read MoreNew Symposium: Elisabeth Perham, Maartje de Visser and Rosalind Dixon introduce a new symposium on the Blog on Small State Constitutionalism. Based on an edited collection of the same name published by Hart in 2025, the symposium highlights the constitutional issues caused by or encountered in relation to small state jurisdictions.
Read MoreWith Opinion CDL-AD(2025)038-e, adopted at its 144th session on 9–10 October 2025, the Venice Commission was called upon to apply international standards on the composition of judicial councils to a consolidated Western European democracy, Spain, following a request submitted by the President of the General Council of the Judiciary (hereinafter GCJ). In doing so, the Opinion ultimately reaffirms that the composition of judicial councils is no longer a matter of exclusive domestic concern grounded solely in State sovereignty, but rather constitutes an integral element of a European legal order founded on the rule of law and, as such, falls within the scrutiny of European institutions.
Read More3 February 2026 marks the first publication day for the Blog following our Southern Hemisphere summer hiatus. We are delighted to return with a number of exciting updates, including personnel changes, new collaborations, and announcements.
Read MoreThe blog of the International Association of Constitutional Law (IACL)
Powered by Squarespace.