Ramona COMAN, Viktor KAZAI, Leonardo PULEO and Andrew BRADLEY (eds)

This book explores what judges do and how they perceive their roles in the context of growing dissensus over liberal democracy. Focusing on the European landscape, it asks eighteen judges how they perceive their roles when judicial independence and democracy are under pressure.

Peter OLDHAM KC

This is a revelatory account of the National Industrial Relations Court’s defining crisis, and of the highly unorthodox way in which its President, Sir John Donaldson, went about his role.

David FELDMAN

This book argues that disagreement lies at the heart of all constitutions — particularly the UK’s — and that efforts to manage it drive constitutional change.

Heinz KLUG

This new edition presents the South African Constitution in its historical and social context.

Uladzislau BELAVUSAU, Aleksandra Gliszczynska-GRABIAS, Maria MÄLKSOO and Angelika NUßBERGER (eds)

This open access book explores the political utility and consequences of memory laws with a focus on how militant memory laws frame, underpin and generate international conflicts.

Emily GORDON, Charles MITCHELL and Ian WILLIAMS(eds)

This collection presents a socio-legal history of epidemics from the medieval period to the present day.

Mark A W DENG

This book offers the first in-depth analysis of the emerging constitutionalism in South Sudan and the challenges it faces.

Matthias KLATT (ed)

This book is part of a two-volume set that provides an in-depth investigation into the canon of constitutionally conforming interpretation. The two volumes analyse the canon’s employ in the national, supranational, and international context and theoretically reflect on the issues raised.

Alejandro Saiz ARNAIZ and Joan Solanes MULLOR (eds)

In this open access book, leading Spanish scholars explore the role and function of the judicial levels of interaction of the European integration process.

Peter CANE

This book challenges the near-universal acceptance of a US-style, Western constitutional paradigm as the best basis for comparative constitutional studies.

Kevin YL TAN and HP LEE

This book presents an in-depth interrogation of the theory and application of the Basic Structure Doctrine in the Federation of Malaysia.

Paul CRAIG and Robert SCHÜTZE (eds)

This two-volume set on EU landmark cases discusses the most iconic judgments developed by the European Court of Justice since 1957.

Dimitrios KYRITSIS (ed)

This open access book explores the connection between proportionality and the moral concept of freedom from a variety of philosophical perspectives.

Allan C. HUTCHINSON

This book presents a new perspective on the debate around legitimacy, politics and constitutional law in Supreme Courts.

Stergios AIDINLIS

This open access book looks at interactions between UK public sector officials and researchers/innovators to shed light on barriers to data access and use.

Mariana VELASCO-RIVERA

What makes a constitution difficult to amend? Many assume it's the stringency of the amendment rules, as seen with the U.S. Constitution. However, Mexico, with similar rules, has one of the most amended constitutions globally. So, if it's not the stringency of the rules, what is it?

Edited by Inge GOVAERE, Sacha GARBEN and Eleanor SPAVENTA

This timely book astutely charts the transformative effect of the war in Ukraine on the EU, from both a legal and policy perspective.

Paul CRAIG and Robert SCHÜTZE

This 2-volume work on EU landmark cases discusses the most iconic judgments developed by the European Court of Justice since 1957.

Volume 1 explores the ‘constitutional cases’ that have come to define the legal nature and competences of the Union.

Edited by Geneviève CARTIER and Mark D WALTERS

This book assembles critical contributions on the work of T.R.S. Allan, the Professor Emeritus of Jurisprudence and Public Law at the University of Cambridge whose leading work in legal and constitutional theory spans almost 45 years.

Robert CRAIG

This book argues that all non-statutory powers of the Crown are royal prerogative powers and asserts that the Crown does not possess or exercise any 'third source' powers, common law powers or 'Ram doctrine' style freedoms.